MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034732575

Design and Analysis of An Anthropomorphic Two-DoF Ankle-Foot Orthosis

2019· article· en· W3034732575 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Conference Proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsAnkleExoskeletonOrthoticsComputer scienceBarefootPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSimulationEngineeringMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a two-degrees of freedom passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). In view of enhancing anatomical conformity, an anthropomorphic design is proposed to minimize mechanical interferences between ankle and orthosis. The biomimetic features such as passive stabilizers and dampeners in the proposed mechanism intrinsically support the ankle and foot to maintain stability and improve shock-absorbing ability. The mobility, ranges of motion, and manipulability measures for the proposed AFO have been investigated using mathematical modeling and simulation approaches. The analysis revealed the effectiveness of the proposed AFO in meeting the complex kinematics of ankle joint compared to the predecessors. Potentially, the proposed AFO can serve as a platform to carry out research and development on robotic orthoses for the lower extremity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it