Improvement of side resistance prediction for pile foundation using construction information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problems such as the inclination and settlement of buildings after construction completion have been reported in recent years. Quality control during construction and mieruka (“visualizing” the work quality) are increasingly demanded. In light of this, the present study addresses execution with a “rotary penetration steel pipe pile (RPS-pile),” which is a system that is able to collect information in real time during the piling process. When an RPS-pile is placed, high push-in and pull-out bearing capacities are expected because the spiral blade at the pile tip resists at the bottom of the borehole against an external force. Additionally, continuous real-time data on the pile-head torque and the auger penetration depth per revolution are obtained, as these mechanical indicators are necessary for piling. This study aims at developing a method for the real-time confirmation of work quality at construction sites by utilizing construction information (information obtained during piling). Specifically, a method is proposed for the sequential updating of reliability in the estimation of the side friction acting on a drilled pile. In this method, real-time information on the pile-head torque and the auger penetration depth per revolution obtained during piling are used in addition to N-values that are observed in a standard penetration test conducted in advance as part of subsurface exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".