MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034995204 · doi:10.1306/02262018242

On the dolomite reservoirs formed by dissolution: Differential eogenetic versus hydrothermal in the lower Permian Sichuan Basin, southwestern China

2020· article· en· W3034995204 on OpenAlexaff
Di Xiao, Jian Cao, Bing Luo, Xiucheng Tan, Hong Liu, Benjian Zhang, Xun Yang, LI Ya

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolomiteGeologyPermianGeochemistryHydrothermal circulationStructural basinChinaDissolutionDolomitizationDiagenesisPaleontologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Dolomite reservoirs formed by dissolution are significant for hydrocarbon exploration, but their origins are poorly understood because of their complexity. This study investigated the lower Permian Qixia Formation of the Sichuan Basin (northern Longmenshan Mountains), southwestern China, which has recently been the location of giant natural gas discoveries. Petrological and geochemical analyses were undertaken, including trace elements and C, O, and Sr isotopes. The results indicate that the reservoirs were formed by differential eogenetic karstification and hydrothermal dissolution of grain dolomites. Core and thin-section observations identified three types of dolomite based on grain size: fine- to medium-crystalline dolomite (Dol-1), medium- to coarse-crystalline dolomite (Dol-2), and coarse- to megacrystalline saddle dolomite (Dol-3). The Dol-2 types can be further divided into three subtypes according to the grain structure and degree of pore development: euhedral medium- to coarse-crystalline dolomite with pores (Dol-2a), porous subhedral–anhedral medium- to coarse-crystalline dolomite (Dol-2b), and tight subhedral–anhedral medium- to coarse-crystalline dolomite (Dol-2c). The Dol-1 types appear to have formed because of the release of and subsequent metasomatism by Mg2+ in trapped seawater along stylolites at shallow burial conditions (500–1000 m). The Dol-2a types resulted mainly from eogenetic karstification of original limestone and subsequent dolomitization by marine-related fluids. These dolomites are geochemically characterized by relatively flat rare-earth element patterns and relatively low Y/Ho values (mean = 37.1). The Dol-2b and Dol-3 types were formed mainly by hydrothermal fluids and have similar rare-earth element patterns with large positive Eu anomalies (mean = 5.7). The Dol-2c types experienced metasomatism by marine-related fluids mixed with minor hydrothermal fluids. All these formation mechanisms reflect the influence of multistage diagenetic and hydrothermal fluids. The Dol-2a types form the most favorable reservoirs in the study area, followed by the Dol-2b types. The distribution of the Dol-2a types was controlled by eogenetic karstification of grain shoals, whereas that of the Dol-2b types reflects the influence of tectonically derived hydrothermal fluid dissolution of grain shoals. As such, both primary sedimentary features and later differential dissolution (eogenetic and hydrothermal) contributed to reservoir development, which involved factors such as the sedimentary facies (grain shoal), sea-level fluctuations (eogenetic karst development), and faulting (hydrothermal dissolution). Therefore, the formation of dolomite and associated reservoirs is complex. The results of this study provide an improved understanding of the origins and complexity of dolomite reservoirs formed by dissolution, which is relevant to exploration for such reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207