MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035110205 · doi:10.14814/phy2.14458

Comparison of diurnal variation, anatomical location, and biological sex within spontaneous and driven dynamic cerebral autoregulation measures

2020· article· en· W3035110205 on OpenAlex
Joel S. Burma, Paige Copeland, Alannah Macaulay, Omeet Khatra, Jonathan D. Smirl

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsUniversities Space Research Association
KeywordsCerebral autoregulationCardiologyCardiac cycleTranscranial DopplerMedicineAutoregulationCoefficient of variationDiurnal temperature variationCerebral blood flowInternal medicineCircadian rhythmMiddle cerebral arteryReproducibilityBlood pressureMathematicsStatisticsIschemiaPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presently, the literature describing the influence of diurnal variation on dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) metrics is sparse. Additionally, there is little data with respect to dCA comparisons between anterior/posterior circulation beds and biological sexes using squat-stand maneuvers. Eight male and eight female participants (n = 16) performed 5 min of spontaneous upright rest and squat-stand maneuvers at 0.05 and 0.10 Hz across seven time points throughout the day. All testing sessions commenced at 8:00 a.m. each day and dCA parameters were quantified across the cardiac cycle (diastole, mean, and systole) using transcranial Doppler ultrasound to insonate cerebral blood velocity within the middle and posterior cerebral arteries (MCA, PCA). No cardiac cycle alternations were seen spontaneous (all p > .207) while a trend was noted in some driven (all p > .051) dCA metrics. Driven dCA produced much lower coefficient of variances (all <21%) compared with spontaneous (all <58%). Moreover, no sex differences were found within driven metrics (all p > .096). Between vessels, PCA absolute gain was reduced within all spontaneous and driven measures (all p < .014) whereas coherence, phase, and normalized gain were unchanged (all p > .099). There appears to be little influence of diurnal variation on dCA measures across the day (8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.). Absolute gain was blunted in the PCA relative to the MCA and consistent with previous literature, driven methods demonstrated vastly improved reproducibility metrics compared to spontaneous methods. Finally, no dCA differences were found between biological sexes, demonstrating that males and females regulate in a harmonious manner, when females are tested within the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it