MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3035124962 · doi:10.1101/2020.06.09.137612

Primary platinum resistance and immune exclusion in ovarian carcinomas with high expression of the homologous recombination mediator RAD51

2020· preprint· en· W3035124962 on OpenAlexaff
Michał Marek Hoppe, Tuan Zea Tan, Stefanus Lie, Sherlly Lim, Joe PS Yeong, Joanna D. Wardyn, Patrick Jaynes, Diana GZ Lim, Brendan Nk Pang, Anthony N. Karnezis, Derek S. Chiu, Samuel Leung, David G. Huntsman, Anna S. Sedukhina, Ko Sato, Stan B. Kaye, Hyungwon Choi, Naina Patel, Robert Brown, Jason J. Pitt, David S.P. Tan, Anand D. Jeyasekharan

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
FundersCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of SingaporeMedical Research CouncilNational Medical Research CouncilNational Research Foundation SingaporeNational Research FoundationOvarian Cancer ActionCancer Research UK
KeywordsRAD51Ovarian cancerCancer researchBiologyOvarian carcinomaHomologous recombinationImmunohistochemistryImmune systemImmune checkpointCancerImmunotherapyImmunologyOncologyGeneMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in ovarian cancer confers increased sensitivity to Poly-ADP-Ribose-Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum. The homologous recombination (HR) mediator RAD51, however, is commonly overexpressed, potentially driving unregulated HR. Due to non-quantitative measurements and heterogeneous cohorts, the clinical relevance of RAD51 expression in ovarian cancer is unclear. Methods Fluorescent immunohistochemistry and multispectral imaging were used to quantitate RAD51 expression, in relation to other markers, in independent cohorts of ovarian carcinomas from British Columbia Cancer (BCC n =284) and the phase III SCOTROC4 trial ( n =268). Independent cohorts (TCGA n =566, GSE9891 n =267, GSE26712 n =185 and GSE3149 n =146) were used for mRNA expression and immune infiltration analyses. Results RAD51-High tumours had shorter progression-free and overall survival compared to RAD51-Low cases in both BCC and SCOTROC4. The negative prognostic significance of high RAD51 was primarily evident in cases classified “HRD negative” by the Myriad genomic scar assay. Unexpectedly, overexpression of RAD51 in ovarian cancer cell lines did not affect sensitivity to platinum or PARP inhibitors, but modified the expression of immune-regulatory genes. Accordingly, tumours with high RAD51 mRNA showed consistent changes in immunomodulatory transcripts across four independent ovarian cancer cohorts. In-situ multiplexed imaging confirmed that high RAD51 tumours correlated with tumour exclusion of cytotoxic-T-cells, possibly explaining their poor outcomes after chemotherapy. Conclusions High RAD51 expression, in conjunction with a HRD score <42, identifies a subgroup of EOC cases with platinum resistance and an immune excluded tumour microenvironment. Tumours with high RAD51 may require alternate or additional adjuvant therapeutic strategies to overcome immune exclusion. Statement of Translational Relevance Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in ovarian cancer confers increased sensitivity to Poly-ADP-Ribose-Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum. Currently, methods to identify patients who do poorly on first-line platinum based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer represent an unmet clinical need. In this report we show that RAD51 expression can identify patients with primary platinum resistance in two large cohorts, including a unique phase-III trial of carboplatin as adjuvant monotherapy. The clinical relevance of a positive genomic scar HRD score, a biomarker for assessing HRD status, in predicting benefit to PARP inhibitors has been established following recent phase 3 trials in first line and 2 nd line maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer. Our findings suggest that HRD negative ovarian tumours may be further stratified by RAD51 expression status in the context of platinum sensitivity, and may serve to guide future trials of HRD targeted agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy→French-language works237,207→