MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035129206 · doi:10.1142/s0219887820501352

Large-scale correction and thermal properties of holographic dual background of an adaptive graphene model

2020· article· en· W3035129206 on OpenAlex
Z. Zali, J. Sadeghi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsCanadian Quantum Research Center
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetric (unit)PhysicsLogarithmGrapheneLaplace's equationLength scaleStatistical physicsLaplace transformMathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanicsDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the particle on curved graphene space-time. In that case, we calculate the geometric form of potential which is known as Gaussian function. Here, we introduce the metric background which completely corresponds to curved graphene space-times. This metric leads us to obtain the geometry potential and we make the Laplace Beltrami equation in the mentioned metric background. We also rearrange such relation in terms of the second-order equation. By using the known polynomial, we solve the particle equation of motion in graphene background. In that case, we arrive the energy spectrum which has three terms. We take advantage from energy spectrum and investigate the thermal properties of system. The additional terms give us an opportunity to obtain the corrected entropy and free energy. So, we show that the additional term comes from geometry potential. This correction is important for the large scale. Hence, we show that correction term is logarithmic as well as small scale corrections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it