MeV Emission from Pulsar Wind Nebulae: Understanding Extreme Particle Acceleration in Highly Relativistic Outflows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Earth is constantly bombarded from outer space by energetic particles (e.g., electrons e \n−, \npositrons e \n+, protons, nuclei; (1)). Where and how these “cosmic rays” are produced is poorly \nunderstood, with various particle types and energies likely originating from different sources. \nParticularly mysterious is the source of high-energy e \n± produced in our Galaxy, especially those \nresponsible for both the high fraction of e \n+ in the GeV cosmic ray lepton spectrum (e.g., (2)) and \nthe e \n± and observed excess of microwaves (e.g., (3)) and γ-rays (e.g., (4)) detected towards the \nGalactic center and bulge. While these particles could be evidence for exotic forms of dark matter \n(e.g., (5)), they might also be produced by “normal” astrophysical sources such as pulsars (e.g., \n(6; 7)) – the strongly magnetized, rapidly rotating neutron stars whose rotational energy powers \nan ultra-relativistic outflow (commonly referred to as a “pulsar wind”) whose interaction with the \nsurrounding medium creates a pulsar wind nebula (PWN; see (8) for a recent review). While the \ndetection of TeV emission from numerous PWNe (e.g., (9; 10)) strongly suggest they contain e \n± \nwith PeV or higher energies, how and to what energies these particles are produced is unknown, \nlet alone their dependence on the properties of the pulsar, pulsar wind, and surrounding medium. \nA major reason for this uncertainty is the lack of information concerning their MeV properties, \nsince the synchrotron emission from the highest energy e \n± peaks in this waveband. Only by \ncombining the MeV spectrum of PWNe measured by proposed missions (e.g., AMEGO (11), \nLOX) with that obtained at lower (primarily radio and X-ray) and higher (TeV) photon energies \nby current and hopefully future (e.g., SKA, ngVLA, ATHENA, AXIS, LYNX, CTA) facilities is it \npossible to measure the full spectrum of e \n± in these sources. The resultant insights into the \nunderlying acceleration mechanism would significantly impact many areas of astrophysics – from \nindirect searches for dark matter (as described above) to the origin of cosmic rays to the physics \nof relativistic outflows observed from active galactic nuclei (AGN), γ-ray bursts (GRBs), and \nsome gravitational wave (GW) events (e.g., (12)).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".