Glucocorticosteroids for primary sclerosing cholangitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glucocorticosteroids have been suggested for primary sclerosing cholangitis, which is characterised by chronic inflammation and fibrosis in the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tree. OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of glucocorticosteroids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE from their inception until March 2003, and reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose or duration of glucocorticosteroids versus placebo, no intervention, or other immunosuppressive agents. We included trials irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers extracted data independently and assessed the methodological quality by the generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, and follow-up. The results of the meta-analyses were presented as relative risks or weighted mean difference (WMD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome measures were mortality and liver-related morbidity. MAIN RESULTS: Two randomised clinical trials were eligible for inclusion. One trial compared biliary lavage with hydrocortisone versus saline in 17 patients. A significant number of adverse events (pancreatitis; cholangitis with septicaemia; paranoid ideas; fluid retention) and no cholangiographic improvement led to termination of the trial. The other trial compared budesonide versus prednisone in 18 patients. Patients had significantly higher serum bilirubin concentration after treatment with prednisone compared with budesonide (WMD 10.4 micro mol/litre, 95% CI 1.16 to 19.64 micro mol/litre). No other significant effects on clinical or biochemical outcomes were identified for any of the evaluated interventions. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support or refute peroral glucocorticosteroids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".