Experimental Investigation of Archimedes Screw Pump
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is essentially no experimental data on Archimedes screw pump performance available in the literature that is sufficiently detailed for model validation. Experiments were conducted on a laboratory scale (0.3-m diameter) Archimedes screw pump to characterize the pumping efficiency of the screw pump at various inlet basin water levels and screw rotation speeds. The results provide new insights into the effect of inlet and outlet basin level on screw pump efficiency. The flow rate of water pumped is proportional to the rotation speed of the screw, and increases with increasing inlet basin depth until the basin level exceeds that needed to fully fill the screw without overflowing. Comparisons are made to available empirical and analytically derived guidelines regarding optimal lower basin water levels, upper basin water levels and rotation rates for an Archimedes screw pump. Some differences are noted between recommended optimal conditions for full-size screws from the literature, and the optimum conditions found for the tested laboratory-size screw. These differences are consistent with expected effects of scaling between different size screws.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it