MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035484959 · doi:10.4037/aacnacc2020265

Widening the Ethical Lens in Critical Care Settings

2020· article· en· W3035484959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elaine C. Meyer, Franco A. Carnevale, C. Walton Lillehei, Melissa Kurtz Uveges

Bibliographic record

VenueAACN Advanced Critical Care · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioethicsIconLibrary scienceAssociate editorCitationSociologyArt historyLawHistoryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ethics in Critical Care| June 15 2020 Widening the Ethical Lens in Critical Care Settings CE Article Elaine C. Meyer, PhD, RN; Elaine C. Meyer, PhD, RN Elaine C. Meyer is Faculty Associate, Center for Bioethics, and Associate Professor of Psychology, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (elainecmeyer@gmail.com). Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Franco A. Carnevale, PhD (Psych), PhD (Phil), RN; Franco A. Carnevale, PhD (Psych), PhD (Phil), RN Franco A. Carnevale is Full Professor, Ingram School of Nursing; Associate Member, Faculty of Medicine (Pediatrics); Adjunct Professor, Counselling Psychology; and Affiliate Member, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Craig Lillehei, MD; Craig Lillehei, MD Craig Lillehei is Chair of Surgical Education, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Melissa Kurtz Uveges, PhD, MA, RN Melissa Kurtz Uveges, PhD, MA, RN Department Editor Melissa Kurtz Uveges is Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar AACN Adv Crit Care (2020) 31 (2): 210–220. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2020265 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Citation Elaine C. Meyer, Franco A. Carnevale, Craig Lillehei, Melissa Kurtz Uveges; Widening the Ethical Lens in Critical Care Settings. AACN Adv Crit Care 15 June 2020; 31 (2): 210–220. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2020265 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAACN Advanced Critical Care Search Advanced Search Sophia is a 5-month-old infant who was prenatally diagnosed with asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy, or Jeune syndrome, a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder affecting bone growth. Those with Jeune syndrome have very small chests that restrict lung growth and respiratory function, "short ribs, shortened bones in the arms and legs, short stature," and polydactyly.1 The long-term prognosis varies widely for infants diagnosed with Jeune syndrome; some survive into adolescence or adulthood, but many succumb to pulmonary insufficiency or infections during the first 2 years of life. After infancy, children with Jeune syndrome may develop renal insufficiency. Less common features include heart defects, liver disease, pancreatic cysts, and retinal dystrophy. Sophia was born via planned caesarian delivery at 38 weeks' gestation; her mother's pregnancy had been carefully monitored. At 3 weeks of age, Sophia developed increasing difficulty with breastfeeding, experiencing cyanosis and severe respiratory... ©2020 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses2020 You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.052
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.126
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0520.126
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.029
Scholarly communication0.0260.029
Open science0.0030.018
Research integrity0.0170.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAACN Advanced Critical CareSame topicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207