Physical-Layer Authentication for Internet of Things via WFRFT-Based Gaussian Tag Embedding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) is regarded as the fundamental platform for many emerging services, such as smart city, smart home, and intelligent transportation systems. With ever-increasing penetration of IoT, it becomes of great importance to ensure the IoT security, as the security threats are extended from the cyber world to the physical world. In this article, we investigate physical-layer authentication to help verify the identity of IoT entities for preventing unauthorized access to information or service. Specifically, we propose a Gaussian-tag-embedded physical-layer authentication (GTEA) scheme by using a weighted fractional Fourier transform (WFRFT). Through the superimposition of a low-power Gaussian WFRFT tag onto the message signal, the legitimate receiver can verify the authenticity of the received signal at the physical layer, without being detected by adversaries. Moreover, security analysis shows that with the deliberately designed Gaussian tag, the GTEA scheme is robust against spoofing and replaying attacks. In addition, tradeoff analysis and simulation results are provided to demonstrate the capability of the GTEA scheme in achieving reliability of the message delivery, stealth of the embedded tag signal, and balancing the tradeoff among the robustness of user authentication. Moreover, a prototype is further developed using FPGA and experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness and performance improvement of the proposed GTEA scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".