MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035572546 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.150304

Green Nanoparticles Investigation to Remove Water Pollutants by Fenton Reaction Using Celery Leaves Extract

2020· article· en· W3035572546 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Saba N. Fayyadh, Nurfaizah Abu Tahrim

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
KeywordsPollutantNanoparticleFenton reactionChemistryEnvironmental chemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wastewater containing dyes is a major source of environmental pollution. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of celery leaves extract employed to prepare zerovalent Iron nanoparticles (C-nZVFe) as a catalyst in Fenton reaction. The getting nanoparticles are then applied to decolorization aqueous solutions containing orange (OG) dyes. The C-nZVFe catalyst has been characterized by Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) techniques for the investigation of structural and surface morphology properties. The size and surface area of synthesized C-nZVFe are observed around 40 -55 nm. Using ultraviolet-visible (UVvis) spectroscopy, the amount of dye in the aqueous sol is observed. Orange G removal percentage (100 mg L -1 ) reached 86% [35 mg L -1 , 60 min, and pH 4]. C-nZVFe nanoparticles demonstrated more efficient percentage capacity as a Fenton catalyst removal and are more economical, efficient, and recyclable than other conventional Fenton oxidation catalysts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207