The Association Between Growth Trajectories and Mental Health in Early- to Mid-childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With increasing recognition of mental health’s importance for overall health, public health professionals are seeking to better understand early risk factors for mental illness. A majority of mental health problems emerge during childhood; there is evidence of a particular association between increased childhood growth and poorer mental health. The current study sought to determine the association between growth trajectories during infancy and early childhood (birth to age 5) and mental health (behavioural and emotional difficulties) in early- to mid-childhood (age 3 to 8). The study was conducted among a subset (n=665) of participants from The Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!), an ongoing longitudinal cohort study. Five growth trajectories were determined via repeated measures of age- and sex-standardized body mass index (BMI). Mental health was assessed using the Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) total difficulties, externalizing problems, and internalizing problems scores. The sociodemographic and health characteristics of the sample were described by mental health status (per the SDQ). The sociodemographic and health characteristics of the sample were described by mental health status (per the SDQ). Regression analyses were run to determine the association between growth trajectories and SDQ scores. There was no statistically significant association between increased growth (“rapidly accelerating” trajectory) and SDQ total difficulties (b=1.49[-3.82,6.81],p=0.58), externalizing problems (b=0.31[-3.29,3.91],p=0.86), or internalizing problems (b=1.18[-1.73,4.09],p=0.43). There was a significant association between decelerating growth and increased internalizing problems (b=0.69[0.07,1.31],p=0.03). Current results do not support an association between increased growth and poorer mental health overall in early- to mid-childhood; however, a pattern of decelerating growth may be associated with more internalizing problems. Understanding early risk factors for poor mental health may allow public health researchers to develop targeted interventions and ultimately improve mental health outcomes across the lifespan. Implications and future directions will be discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".