Context and Location Awareness in Eco-Driving Recommendations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eco-driving techniques are methods that drivers can take in order to improve their vehicles’ fuel efficiency. One way of implementing such methods is to recommend changes in driving habits focusing on saving fuel. Recommendation systems in the context of efficient driving may take numerous data sources as input and serve multiple purposes. In this work, we develop a recommendation system that suggests changes in engine revolutions per minute (RPM) that reduce fuel consumption. We simulate the effects of this system using a vehicular sensor dataset that contains location, speed, RPM, and consumption. We also investigate the effects of including location data in the recommendations as a way to leverage local habits and behaviors. Both methods reduced fuel consumption in all recorded trips. Moreover, using only local data yielded a mean fuel reduction of 43%, whereas using the entire dataset reduced the fuel consumption in 56% on average. Upon analyzing the resulting changes, we noted that such a difference in fuel consumption is due to the local recommendations not having access to global optimal data points and accounting for local behavior that is affected by aspects such as terrain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".