On the Optimization of User Association and Resource Allocation in HetNets With mm-Wave Base Stations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article investigates the problem of joint user association and resource allocation, defined by the number of allocated time-slots, in hybrid heterogeneous networks with the coexistence of sub-6-GHz base stations and millimeter wave (mm-Wave) base stations. To do so, we formulate a joint optimization problem to improve the efficiency of resource utilization by maximizing the number of associated users and minimizing the number of allocated time-slots. The optimization problem is formulated as a binary integer linear program and is proved to be NP-hard. Accordingly, we propose two efficient heuristic algorithms to solve it. The first one is centralized and relies on complete information, whereas the second one is distributed and is based on a reinforcement learning approach. The proposed distributed learning algorithm aims to find the best association for each user based on its past experience, automatically and independently from others. Simulation results show that the performances of both proposed algorithms are close-to-optimal with an important reduction in computational complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it