MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035882836 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.140

141 Total bilirubin rate of rise of in moderate preterm neonates: impact of gestational age

2019· article· en· W3035882836 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thivia Jegathesan, Vinod K. Bhutani, Douglas M. Campbell, Vibhuti Shah, Jennifer Twiss, Saisujani Rasiah, Shangari Baleswaran, Jeffrey Antwi, Disha Prajapati, Aadi Jhaveri, Sabeen Ehsan, Gayathri Visvanathaiyer, Michael Sgro

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesHealth Sciences CentreMcMaster University Medical CentreMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational ageGestationBilirubinBirth weightJaundicePediatricsObstetricsNomogramPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background As compared to term neonates, those < 35 weeks gestation (wks GA) are at greater risk for both acute and chronic bilirubin encephalopathy (ABE, CBE). Among these with postnatal total bilirubin rate of rise, (TB ROR) at age 0 to 72 hours has been observed because of either loss placental elimination system or increased postnatal production due to hemolysis. The ranges are known to vary > 8.5 umol/L/h in neonates with Rh disease to >3.4 umol/L/h at the 95th percentile track of the hour-specific nomogram. TB ROR in healthy term neonates is <3.4 umol/L/h. Objectives To determine the GA ranges on TB ROR to explore predictive TB ROR in preterm neonates who are more vulnerable with each <35 wks GA. Design/Methods A multi-site observational study to quantify TB ROR in preterm infants between 28 to 35 weeks. 1804 infants born between January 2013- March 2018 at 28–35 wks GA from three canadian perinatal centres were included and those with Rh disease were excluded. Analysis included infants >27 weeks with at least one TB prior to the initiation of treatment for severe hyperbilirubinemia treatment. Feeding patterns, birth history and maternal health conditions were documented. Results The TB ROR were compared by two prematurity GA groups (28–31 weeks and 32–35 weeks) then per individual gestational age in four time periods in hours, 0–24, 24–48, 48–96, and 96 -120 in 1049 preterm infants using 3065 TB samples. Infants <28 weeks GA were excluded since they represented a more diverse population. TB ROR by prematurity groups over all was higher in 32–35 weeks group at 0–12 hours (3.85 umol/L/h) and 25–36 hours (2.81umol/L/h) and decreased at 49–72 hours (0.24umol/L/h) time period as compared to the less mature group. Conclusion Though TB ROR were of similar patterns between prematurity groups (28–31 weeks and 32–35 weeks) it was at higher rate of rise between 13–36 hours and decreasing from 36–72 hours, with a plateau after 72 hours of age. There was a significant difference in the magnitude of TB ROR between prematurity groups at 0–24 hours. Additional research into the clinical care impact on the TB ROR should be conducted to study impact of production and elimination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207