MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Feature Extraction Method of Ball Mill Load Based on Adaptive Variational Mode Decomposition and Improved Power Spectrum Analysis

2020· article· en· W3035899752 on OpenAlexaff
Yunpeng Gao, Zongsheng Qing, C. S. Wu, Xuan Li, Pingao Wang, Taotao Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalMcGill University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBall millMillGrindingVibrationBall (mathematics)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceEngineeringAcousticsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The real-time working conditions of the ball mill in the grinding process are complicated, which makes it difficult to accurately obtain the internal load status of the ball mill. In this paper, the energy difference between the original cylinder vibration signal and the intrinsic mode function is proposed as the evaluation parameter of the adaptive variational mode decomposition (VMD) layer number, and a new autocorrelation function is constructed. The intrinsic mode function is processed by introducing the energy centrobaric method of the Nuttall self-convolution window. Accordingly, a ball mill load feature extraction method based on adaptive VMD and improved power spectrum estimation is proposed, and the ball mill load identification system based on LabVIEW is developed. The number of layers of intrinsic mode function could be adaptively determined. And the algorithm’s ability to resist mode aliasing and false components of this method is improved, which improves the accuracy of ball mill load detection. The measured results show that internal load features of ball mill during the grinding process are effectively extracted, and the mill load status is accurately identified, which provide an accurate and reliable basis for grinding optimization control and efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207