MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035967760 · doi:10.20381/bxr8-v639

Data citation: APA 7 style guide, 2nd ed.

2020· article· en· W3035967760 on OpenAlexaffabout
Susan Mowers, Alain El Hofi

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationStyle (visual arts)Computer scienceData scienceLibrary scienceHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Use this guide and easily cite Statistics Canada public use microdata from odesi.ca any time you analyse, use or communicate about the data or data materials. Benefits of data citation, include, 1) to ensure your readers can find and understand your data sources, and 2) to improve trust in, and the accountability of, your research results or data adaptations! This guide uses the American Psychological Association citation style 7th edition (or APA 7). You may adapt these APA 7 Style examples to other citation styles by consulting those styles and e.g.,this guide, Swaen, B. (2020, April 23). Citation Styles Guide: Which Citation Style Should You Use? http://www.scribbr.com/citing-sources/citation-styles/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.219
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.219
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0220.052
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6000.594

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.629
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicSurvey Methodology and NonresponseFrench-language works237,207