Academic Discipline “History of Ukraine” in Higher Education Institutions: Problems, Judgments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background:In the field of social sciences and the humanities, in the late 80-s and early 90-s of the 20th century, a radical rethinking of values, social theory, and social practice took place in Ukraine.The domain of theorists of democratic countries has entered into scientific circulation.In recent years, many young Ukrainian scientistshistorians have taken part in internships and attended courses on the basics of democracy, the state, and the principles of political development of society at universities in the USA, France, Great Britain, Canada, Germany, and other democratic countries.The general evolution of the theory from Marxism to post-Marxism, and from it to modern historical science, has taken place.Historical sciences have become vital, realistic, analytical, that is, science in the full sense, and not ideology.This arouses trust in itself and at the same time provides an opportunity to attract the comprehension of urgent problems of modern sociopolitical development. Results:In the mid-90-s, the first post of a non-Soviet generation of scientists appeared, brought up in Western scientific paradigms (albeit through Russian and Polish translations), with qualitatively different ideas about the craft of the historian and the model of social advancement.However, not all of those young people who have already established themselves as mature researchers have been able to pursue scientific degrees, and only some of those who have received them have been able to withstand Soviet practices of new research paradigms.In modern conditions, new conceptual and methodological approaches to the study of historical processes are promoted.Member of the French Academy of Sciences, Director of Research at the Graduate School of Social Sciences (Paris), Pierre Nora, put forward the idea of "speeding up history".He believes that the key characteristic of the present time is not a successive change, but a changethe rapid overthrow of all events into the past, is quickly moving away from us.These changes destroyed the continuity of historical time, the straightforward progressive nature of the development of events that traditionally connected the present and future with the past.In light of this, a new question is raised about the options for historical representations.How a society, nation, group or family imagined its future,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".