MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036077217 · doi:10.1101/2020.06.19.162222

Glyphosate used to control invasive <i>Phragmites australis</i> in standing water poses little risk to aquatic biota

2020· preprint· en· W3036077217 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Courtney Robichaud, Rebecca C. Rooney

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des ParcsMinistry of EnvironmentOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and ForestryMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsGlyphosatePhragmitesAminomethylphosphonic acidMarshEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryWetlandBiotaSedimentAquatic ecosystemChemistryAnimal scienceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract When an invasive wetland grass degrades a Ramsar wetland and Important Bird Area, decisive management action is called for. To limit the extent and spread of European Phragmites australis , the Ontario government began the first, large-scale application of glyphosate (Roundup Custom®) over standing water to control an invasive species in Canadian history. Between 2016 and 2018, over 1000 ha of marsh were treated. To assess the risk this herbicide presented to aquatic biota, we measured the concentration of glyphosate, its primary breakdown product aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), and the alcohol ethoxylate-based adjuvant Aquasurf® in water and sediments in areas of the highest exposure risk and up to 150 m into adjacent bays. We never detected glyphosate or AMPA at concentrations exceeding thresholds of toxicological concern. The maximum observed concentration of glyphosate in water was 0.320 ppm, occurring within 24 hr of application. The maximum glyphosate concentration in sediment was 0.250 ppm, occurring within 30 days of application. AMPA was detectable in water and sediment, indicating microbial breakdown of glyphosate in the marsh, but at low concentrations (max water = 0.025 ppm, max sed = 0.012 ppm). The maximum distance from the point of application at which glyphosate was detected in the water was 100 m, vs. 0 m for AMPA. Concentrations in water returned to pre-treatment levels ( 0.005 ppm) for over one year but less than two years. Concentrations of alcohol ethoxylates were variable in space and time, following a pattern that could not be attributed to Aquasurf® application. The direct, over-water application of Roundup Custom® with Aquasurf® to control invasive P. australis does not pose a toxicological risk to aquatic biota. Highlights Glyphosate-based herbicide was applied directly to >1000 ha of marsh to control invasive P. australis Glyphosate and AMPA did not reach levels of toxicological concern for aquatic biota Aquasurf® exceedances were observed but could not be attributed to P. australis control activity Glyphosate, AMPA, and Aquasurf® dispersed no more than 100 m from the point of application Glyphosate, AMPA and Aquasurf® in water returned to baseline levels within 30 days of application Glyphosate, AMPA and Aquasurf® in sediment returned to baseline levels within 2 years

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207