Des Africaines rebelles : Léonie Abo, Aoua Kéita, Simone Kaya Une exploration de l'héritage féministe des Canadiennes d'origine africaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research demonstrates the importance of taking into account the cultural and social history of African women who are part of the African diaspora of Canada, since these women immigrate with social and cultural background, including gender relations. In this work, we argue that the universalizing approach of Western feminism perpetuates imperialist ideologies. Before defining Feminism among African immigrant women in North- America, it is essential to listen to the voice of colonized African women. Their cultural heritage underlines the importance of knowing other stories from women from various countries to provide essential nuances of public discourse and policy related to the rights and claims of African Canadian women. Knowing the Afro-feminist discourse in Canada would help to build an identity among immigrant women that fosters a sense of belonging to today’s multicultural Canadian society. Through the post-colonial approach that takes into account the impact of colonization on the relationship between women and men in Africa, we have been able to bring to life the unknown stories of African women in order to understand the issues related to the status of women of yesterday and today. The memoirs of Léonie Abo (Une Femme du Congo by Ludo Martens) and the autobiographies of Aoua Kéita (Femme d'Afrique, La vie d'Aoua Kéita racontée par elle-même) and Simone Kaya (Les danseuses d'Impé-eya, jeunes filles à Abidjan) reveal that indeed, colonialism has added a second layer on gender inequalities in African societies. In this sense, African women who are part of the Canadian diaspora, immigrate with a cultural background, including the double subjection of colonialism and patriarchy, in addition to being marginalized by the factor of race in their host country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".