MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036087272 · doi:10.1190/int-2020-0035.1

Azimuthal P-P prestack amplitudes in the presence of oil-filled aligned porosity (fracture porosity)

2020· article· en· W3036087272 on OpenAlex
Heloise B. Lynn, Bill Goodway

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterpretation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsGimbel Eye Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzimuthAmplitudePorosityGeologyPerpendicularBinMineralogyBoreholeFracture (geology)GeometryPhysicsOpticsGeotechnical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3D P-P high-fold full-azimuth full-offset reflection survey was acquired and processed to characterize a naturally fractured carbonate reservoir. The reservoir is a thick carbonate, which will flow commercial oil with a sufficient fracture network. Extensive calibration data include (1) a horizontal borehole’s resistivity image log, (2) the first 24 months cumulative oil produced, by stage, as known from chemical frac tracer data, (3) pre- and postfrac job instantaneous shut-in pressures, (4) microseismic, and (5) wireline log data. We used the cumulative oil production to document the spatially varying amount of aligned vertical porosity (aligned compliance or fracture porosity) connected to the stage borehole location. The stages of high oil production exhibited, for the fracture-perpendicular azimuth, the more positive amplitude variation with angle (AVA) gradients, and dimmer near-angle (6°–15° angles of incidence) amplitudes, compared to the fracture-parallel azimuth. The azimuthal variation of the AVA gradient fit the cos 2θ curve well, indicating the presence of one set of vertical aligned fractures dominating the azimuthal amplitude signature. In a similar fashion, the azimuthal variation of the mathematical intercept, physically the near-angle amplitudes, also fit the cos 2θ curve well. We have constructed crossplots of the azimuthal near-angle amplitude versus the AVA gradient on a bin-by-bin basis: we observed a straight line at bins with elevated oil production (elevated fracture density). A straight line crossplot of the (AVA gradient, mathematical intercept) is the signature of change of the (sensed) porosity, as long as the lithology and pore fluid are held constant. In accord with industry knowledge, we found that porosity affects the P impedance and thus the near-angle amplitudes: the aligned porosity yields azimuthal P impedance (measured at the 6°–15° angles of incidence). Legacy high-fold 3D P-P surveys rich in the 6°–20° angles of incidence should be considered for reprocessing and reinterpretation using these techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it