Use of Arterial Grafts in Hypothenar Hammer Syndrome: Application of Perforator Flap Anatomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypothenar hammer syndrome (HHS) is traditionally treated with venous bypass grafting, but controversy has arisen as arterial grafts have become more available. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing ulnar artery bypass grafting for HHS with an arterial graft from 2008 to 2017 was performed. We also review the literature for patency rates and discuss the scenarios that favor different graft choices. RESULTS: Six patients were included in our series. Five had primary surgery and 1 had revision surgery for HHS. Five arterial grafts were from the deep inferior epigastric artery and 1 was from the lateral circumflex femoral artery. The proximal anastomotic site was the ulnar artery for all: n = 6. The distal anastomosis site was the palmar arch and common digital artery (CDA) of the ring/small finger and CDA of the middle/ring finger: n = 3; the palmar arch and the CDA of the ring/small finger: n = 3. All patients were symptom-free at follow-up and had a patent ulnar artery on Allen's testing or angiogram. CONCLUSION: Patency rates of arterial grafts for HHS appear to be excellent and this small series and may offer an alternative to traditional venous grafts and end-to-end arterial anastomoses. We suggest using arterial perforator grafts from free flap donor sites. These have well-described anatomy, are easily harvested, and carry minimal donor site morbidity. Lateral circumflex femoral artery graft is favored in patients requiring a single distal anastomosis, who have a ventral hernia, or who are obese. Deep inferior epigastric artery graft is preferred when multiple distal targets or versatile configurations are needed, in thin patients, or in female patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".