Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, many urban regeneration projects that are actively underway are planned as super block complex with a single development, so that the internal plan looks complete, but the linkage and expansion with the surroundings are significantly reduced at the urban level. Therefore, in order to coexist with existing cities, to be flexible, efficient, and sustainable, it is not only necessary to analyze the characteristics of the small block structure utilized in the physical framework of urban regeneration but also to understand the fundamental planning strategy of urban design from a macro perspective. In this study, through the case analysis of 4 cities on the west coast of the United States and Canada, this study derives the economic, social and environmental characteristics and advantages of the small block structure corresponding to the various uses and density of developments while maintaining the historical characteristics and spatial continuity of the existing city structure. In addition, as a best practice of urban regeration, Pearl District in Portland, practically applicable urban design guidelines related with small block ideas are presented in terms of urban form, transportation, resources, environment and cultural aspects. It also derives the specific benefit of small block structures; 1) the right of access to living infrastructures through public street. 2) the establishment of slow transportation infrastructure, 3) the high performance design to corresponding micro-climate on the street level, Lastly, the area of ??cultural locality includes historical characteristics, borrowing density and height between individual blocks to preserve community assets and to improve social integration and habitability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it