Stable, Bromine-Free, Tetragonal Perovskites with 1.7 eV Bandgaps via A-Site Cation Substitution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metal halide perovskite absorbers with wide bandgaps (1.6–1.7 eV) that are suitable for tandem devices typically require high Br concentrations; this renders the material prone to halide segregation and degradation. Inorganic, bromine-free CsPbI3 has a wide bandgap of 1.7 eV and does not suffer from halide segregation; however, these active layers are not stable at room temperature. Here, we report a method to create stable tetragonal perovskites with a bandgap near 1.7 eV: we add small amounts of large A-site cations having ionic radii between 272 and 278 pm—dimethylammonium (DMA) and guanidinium (Gua)—into the crystal lattice. When we deploy perovskites using mixed Cs and these large organic cations, we achieve stable, wide bandgap perovskites with power conversion efficiencies of 15.2% and V OC of 1.19 V. This study extends materials selection for wide bandgap Cs-based perovskites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".