MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036294658 · doi:10.20517/jtgg.2020.23

EHMT1 pathogenic variants and 9q34.3 microdeletions share altered DNA methylation patterns in patients with Kleefstra syndrome

2020· article· en· W3036294658 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah J. Goodman, Cheryl Cytrynbaum, Brian Hon‐Yin Chung, Eric Chater‐Diehl, Celine Aziz, Andrei L. Turinsky, Barbara Kellam, Melanie Keller, Jung Min Ko, Oana Caluseriu, Daria Grafodatskaya, M. Elizabeth McCready, Renée Perrier, Kit San Yeung, Luk Ho-Ming, Jerry Machado, Michael Brudno, Dimitrios J. Stavropoulos, Stephen W. Scherer, A. Micheil Innes, Sau Wei Cheung, Sanaa Choufani, Rosanna Weksberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Translational Genetics and Genomics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersHealth and Medical Research FundCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHaploinsufficiencyGeneticsDNA methylationBiologyHypotoniaMethylationWilliams syndromeEpigeneticsGenePhenotypeNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: Kleefstra syndrome (KS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by haploinsufficiency of the euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1 gene, EHMT1 , due to either a submicroscopic 9q34.3 deletion or a pathogenic EHMT1 variant.KS is characterized by intellectual disability, autistic-like features, heart defects, hypotonia and distinctive facial features.Here, we aimed to (1) identify a unique DNA methylation signature in patients with KS, and (2) demonstrate the efficacy of DNA methylation in predicting the pathogenicity of copy number and sequence variants.Methods: We assayed genome-wide DNA methylation at > 850,000 CpG sites in the blood of KS patients (n = 10) carrying pathogenic variants in EHMT1 or 9q34.3 deletions, as compared to neurotypical controls (n = 42).Differentially methylated sites were validated using additional KS patients (n = 10) and controls (n = 29) to assess specificity and sensitivity of these patterns.Results: The DNA methylation signature of KS demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity; controls and KS patients with a confirmed molecular diagnosis were classified correctly.In additional individuals with EHMT1 alterations, including frameshift or missense variants and partial gene duplications, DNA methylation classifications were consistent with clinical presentation.Furthermore, genes containing differentially methylated CpG sites were enriched for functions related to KS features, including heart formation and synaptic activity. Conclusion:The KS DNA methylation signature did not differ in patients with deletions and variants, supporting haploinsufficiency of EHMT1 as the likely causative mechanism.Beyond this finding, it provides new insights into epigenetic dysregulation associated with KS and can be used to classify individuals with uncertain genomic findings or ambiguous clinical presentations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Translational Genetics and GenomicsSame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207