Potential of Seaweed Gracilaria sp. As inhibitors of Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens and Stapylococcus aureus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The problem of resistance and infectious pathogenicity of bacteria to humans is new at now. The search for alternative new drug compounds from seaweed bioactive content as one of the new antibacterial sources. The purpose of this research is to utilize Gracilaria sp . on the antibacterial effectiveness of Escerichia coli , Clostridium perfringens and Stapylococcus aureus The method used in an experimental laboratory. Extraction was done by maceration with n-hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol. Test antibacterial activity by agar diffusion method. Phytochemical screening based on discoloration. Analysis of bacterial cell leakage based on spectrophotometer results. Yields of 8.08% (ethanol), 5.47% (ethyl acetate) and 1.10% (hexane). Phytochemical screening results contain 6 secondary metabolite compounds in the ethanol and hexane treatment and 7 compounds in the ethyl acetate treatment. The best activity test results on ethyl acetate solvent with inhibition zone of 33.54 mm ( Esherichia coli ), 24.12 mm ( Clostridium perfringens ) and 29.14 mm ( Stapylococcus aureus ). MIC value at 0.51%. The absorbance obtained was 0.178 to 1.898 at a wavelength of 260 nm and 0.149 to 1,328 at a wavelength of 280 nm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it