Parents' Experiences of Transition From Hospital to Home After Their Infant's First-Stage Cardiac Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The intersurgical stage is a critical time for fragile infants with complex congenital heart disease, but little is known about the impact on parents. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore parents' experiences of the transition from hospital to home with their infant after stage 1 cardiac surgery for complex congenital heart disease. METHOD: This is a prospective, longitudinal, mixed methods feasibility study using semistructured interviews and self-report instruments at 4 time points: before discharge (baseline), 2 weeks post discharge, 8 weeks post discharge, and after stage 2 surgery. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically; and quantitative data, descriptively. RESULTS: Sixteen parents of 12 infants participated. All parents described signs of acute stress disorder; 4 parents described symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder before discharge. Parents' fear and uncertainty about going home were multifaceted, underpinned by exposure to numerous traumatic events. By 8 weeks post discharge, parents' feelings and emotions were positive, relieved, and relaxed. Mean generalized anxiety and depression scores were higher before discharge; most individual anxiety and depression scores decreased over time. Physiological survival included self-care needs, such as eating and sleeping properly. Physical survival included preparation of the home environment and home alterations adapting to their infant's equipment needs. Financial survival was a burden, particularly for those unable to return to work. CONCLUSION: Patterns of experience in surviving the transition included psychological, physical, physiological, and financial factors. Authors of further longitudinal research could test the effectiveness of psychological preparation interventions, while encouraging early consideration of the other factors influencing parents' care of their infant after discharge from hospital.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".