Herbivore-induced activation of viral phosphatase disarms plant antiviral immunities for pathogen transmission
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The survival of pathogens depends on their ability to overcome host immunity, especially arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) which must withstand the immune responses of both the host and the arthropod vector. Successful arboviruses often modify host immunity to accelerate pathogen transmission; however, few studies have explored the underlying mechanism. Here we report attracted herbivore infestation on the virus-infected plants promote transmission by the associated vector herbivore. This herbivore-induced defense suppression underpins a subversive mechanism used by Begomovirus , the largest genus of plant viruses, to compromise host defense for pathogen transmission. Begomovirus-infected plants accumulated βC1 proteins in the phloem where they were bound to host defense regulators, transcription factor WRKY20 and two mitogen-activated protein kinases MPK3 and MPK6. Once perceiving whitefly herbivory or endogenous secreted peptide PEP1, the plants started dephosphorylation on serine 33 and stimulated βC1 protein as a phosphatase. βC1 dephosphorylated MPK3/6 and WRKY20, the latter negatively regulated salicylic acid signaling and vascular callose deposition. This viral hijacking of WRKY20 accumulated more vascular callose by which enforced whitefly prolonged salivation and phloem sap ingestion, therefore impelling more virus transmission among plants. We present a scenario in which viruses dynamically respond to the presence of their vectors, suppressing host immunity and promoting pathogen transmission only when needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".