MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036610372

Falar do virtual: a música como caso exemplar do ícone

2003· article· es· W3036610372 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean Fisette

Bibliographic record

VenueDipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) · 2003
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Communication, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconSign (mathematics)SemiosisMusicalSemioticsVirtuality (gaming)EpistemologyDoctrinePhilosophyRepresentation (politics)AestheticsLinguisticsArtLiteratureComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceTheologyLawMathematicsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Semiótica Visual, Quebec, 14-2 1 de octubre. ABsr1AcrThe subject ofsynaesthesia is ofa very high semiotic concern.It is generally defined as a phenomenon by which stimuli of different sensory modes are asso ciated by means ofsome kind ofperceptual similarity.For this reason, this kind ofassociation generally falls within the domain oficonicity.Accounts ofthis phe nomenon can be traced back to Aristotle, who analyzes the analogies between color andflavor, and smell and taste.This paper deals specfically with the sen sorial associations between color and sound, that is, the kind ofsynaesthesias that make a certain link between visual and auditory signs.Among the semioticians, we found mentions of this specific aspect of synaesthesia in Peirce, Jakobson, Veltrusky, Parret, and Zilberberg, just to mention a few.This article offers an overview on the subject, andpresents the results ofa survey that shows the psycho logical correlations between the dimensions of sound (pitch, loudness, timbre, duration) and those ofcolor (hue, lightness, saturation, area).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)Same topicMedia, Communication, and EducationFrench-language works237,207