Dynamic expression and localization of the LIN-2/7/10 protein scaffolding complex during <i>C. elegans</i> vulval development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The evolutionarily conserved LIN-2 (CASK)/LIN-7 (Lin7A-C)/LIN-10 (APBA1) complex plays an important role in regulating spatial organization of membrane proteins and signaling components. In C. elegans, the complex is essential for development of the vulva by promoting the localization of the sole Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) orthologue, LET-23, to the basolateral membrane of the vulva precursor cells (VPCs) where it can specify the vulval cell fate. However, the expression and localization of the LIN-2/7/10 complex, and how the complex regulates receptor localization, are not known. Here we describe an in vivo analysis of the complex in C. elegans VPCs. Only LIN-7 colocalizes with LET-23 EGFR at the basolateral membrane, while the LIN-2/7/10 complex components instead colocalize at cytoplasmic foci, consistent with Golgi or endosomes. LIN-10 recruits LIN-2, which in turn recruits LIN-7. We demonstrate that the complex forms in vivo with particularly strong interaction and colocalization between LIN-2 and LIN-7. Our data suggest that the LIN-2/7/10 complex forms on endomembrane compartments where it likely targets LET-23 EGFR to the basolateral membrane, and point to distinct regulation between LIN-2/7 and LIN-10. Summary Statement LIN-10 recruits LIN-2 and LIN-7 to Golgi or recycling endosomes, consistent with targeting rather than tethering the epidermal growth factor receptor to the basolateral membrane in C. elegans .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".