Public Movements in Formation of Rehabilitation Services for Youth and Children with Disability: Advantages and Risks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper successful examples of activities of public sector in formation of relevant rehabilitation services for children and youth with disability during the time of Ukraine`s independence are reviewed. Adaptation strategies of parents for children disability are analyzed: "normalization", "altruism", "crusade", "obedience". The criteria of social inclusion are determined. The stages of persons with disability "entering" to the social life: adaptation, socialization, integration, inclusion. As a result of research rehabilitation services of non-governmental organizations were reviewed: Charitable Society for Assistance to People with Disabilities as a result of Intellectual Disorders "Dzherela", Lviv Regional Parental Association for the Protection of Children with Cerebral Palsy "Nadiya", All-Ukrainian Association of Persons with Disabilities "Active Rehabilitation Group", All-Ukrainian Charity Organization "Down Syndrome", Non-Governmental Organization "Feel". Development of rehabilitation services for people with disabilities by public movements has its own advantages and risks. The perspective direction of research could be foreseen combination of studying the processes of society democratization and the role of public associations in services development for children and youth with disabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it