MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036743324 · doi:10.24908/pceea.vi0.14148

CONTINUING EDUCATION & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AT GÉNIE UOTTAWA ENGINEERING

2020· article· en· W3036743324 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
C. Laguë, Serge Blais

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfessional developmentContinuing professional developmentPolitical scienceRevenueManagementLibrary scienceBusiness administrationSociologyBusinessPedagogyComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design and implementation of a Continuing Education and Professional Development (CE&PD) ‘intraprise’ by the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Ottawa (GuOE) that involves the active collaboration and contributions of the University’s Professional Development Institute (PDI) as well as other internal and external partners. The ultimate goal of this endeavour is to gradually incorporate CE&PD as an integral component of GuOE’s mission. GuOE has identified five (5) criteria for its CE&PD initiatives: 1. Responding to clear and validated CE&PD needs; 2. Leveraging GuOE’s expertise and resources; 3. Involving and empowering GuOE ‘champions’; 4. Developing ‘win-win’ partnerships with internal (PDI and others) and external organizations and; 5. Generating net revenue for GuOE. In order to generate the required internal ‘buy in’ and commitment, a number of CE&PD pilot projects are being undertaken. The pilot projects allow for experimenting with various forms of CE&PD offerings and intended for different categories of learners.
 Cette communication porte sur le développement et la mise en oeuvre d’une ‘intraprise’ de formation continue et de développement professionnel (FC&DP) à la Faculté de génie de l’Université d’Ottawa (GuOE), en collaboration avec l’Institut de développement professionnel (IDP) de l’Université ainsi que d’autres partenaires internes et externes. Ultimement, cette initiative vise à intégrer graduellement la FC&DP à l’intérieur de la mission éducative de GuOE. Cinq (5) critères ont été identifiés pour les initiatives de FC&DP de GuOE : 1. Répondre à des besoins de FC&DP précis et validés; 2. Tirer profit de l’expertise et des ressources de GuOE; 3. Identifier et impliquer activement des ‘champions’ facultaires; 4. Développer des parternariats ‘gagnant – gagnant’ avec des collaborateurs internes et des organisations externes et; 5. Générer des revenus nets pour GuOE. Un certain nombre de projets pilotes ont été identifiés afin de susciter l’intérêt et la participation de la communauté facultaire. Ceux-ci portent sur différents types de formation et s’adressent à différentes catégories d’apprenants. 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207