Living arrangements and food security of a sample of older Palestinian refugees in Lebanon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Although we know of the relationship between food insecurity, poor dietary intake and health outcomes, there are limited studies examining the determinants of food insecurity in older adults in developing countries. This study describes the living arrangement and characteristics of protracted Palestinian refugees in Lebanon aged 60 years and older and, the status and determinants of household food insecurity. Methods Two surveys, representative of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon (2010 and 2015), were appended and used to examine living arrangement of older adults and household food security. Our final pooled sample included 5412 households and 24,540 individuals. Of these individuals, 10.85% (n=2663) were adults aged 60 years and older, our population of interest. Living arrangement included 1) households with no older adults, 2) multigenerational households that included at least one older adult, 3) older adults living alone, with spouse or with another older person (single households). Food security was collected using two similar questionnaires that were equated and scores were used to classify households into food secure, moderately and severely food insecure. Means and proportions were used to examine household characteristics and sociodemographic and health variables of older adults by living arrangements. Logistic regression tested determinants of food insecurity. Results About 27% of older adults lived in single households and of those living alone, 94.3% were women. Overall, poverty was highly prevalent in households (57%) and only 38% of households were food secure. However, poverty and food insecurity were significantly less prevalent in single households (P<0.0001) and these were also the highest recipients of welfare and remittances. Conclusions Successful interventions to address poverty and food insecurity will require a better understanding of family structure, interactions within the household, and the role that older adults play within the family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".