MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037320463 · doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100703

Development of a time-varying MODIS/ 2D hydrodynamic model relationship between water levels and flooded areas in the Inner Niger Delta, Mali, West Africa

2020· article· en· W3037320463 on OpenAlexafffund
Md Mominul Haque, Ousmane Seidou, Abdolmajid Mohammadian, Abdouramane Gado Djibo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrology Regional Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUnited Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and HealthUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNiger deltaDeltaGeographyRiver deltaEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Physical geographyWater resource managementGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Inner Niger Delta (IND), Mali, West Africa, is a vast floodplain with abundant natural resources that supports the livelihood of about two million people. Ecosystem services in the IND are strongly affected by flood dynamics. An accessible yet accurate flood extent estimation method is crucial for the management of natural resources in the IND. The relationships between water levels and inundation extents are examined for both the rising and receding flood periods, using the outputs of a 2D hydrodynamic model. Inundation extents derived from MODIS images were used to validate the result. The relationship between water levels and flooded areas in the IND changes from year to year due to the amplitude of the incoming flood. Equations were developed to capture that dynamic relationship and estimate flood extent in real-time from September to the end of flood using water levels at Mopti. The relationship is dependent on the maximum water level at Mopti and maximum flooded area which was forecasted using streamflow and precipitation in the Upper Niger Basin. Results show that in addition to forecasting the maximum inundation ahead of time, the inundation predicted with the method shows improvement over the existing formulas by Mahé et al. (2011), Zwart et al. (2005), and Mariko (2003).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydrology Regional StudiesSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207