Advanced Algorithms for Penalized Quantile and Composite Quantile Regression
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss a family of robust, high-dimensional regression models for quantile and composite quantile regression, both with and without an adaptive lasso penalty for variable selection. We reformulate these quantile regression problems and obtain estimators by applying the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), majorize-minimization (MM), and coordinate descent (CD) algorithms. Our new approaches address the lack of publicly available methods for (composite) quantile regression, especially for high-dimensional data, both with and without regularization. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate the need for different algorithms applicable to a variety of data settings, which we implement in the cqrReg package for R. For comparison, we also introduce the widely used interior point (IP) formulation and test our methods against the IP algorithms in the existing quantreg package. Our simulation studies show that each of our methods, particularly MM and CD, excel in different settings such as with large or high-dimensional data sets, respectively, and outperform the methods currently implemented in quantreg. The ADMM approach offers specific promise for future developments in its amenability to parallelization and scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it