MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037365329 · doi:10.1002/mp.14351

Automatic arterial input function selection in CT and MR perfusion datasets using deep convolutional neural networks

2020· article· en· W3037365329 on OpenAlexafffund
Anthony Winder, Christopher D. d’Esterre, Bijoy K. Menon, Jens Fiehler, Nils D. Forkert

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersCalgary FoundationCanada Research ChairsHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer sciencePerfusionPerfusion scanningPearson product-moment correlation coefficientGround truthDeep learningNuclear medicineMedicineRadiologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The computation of perfusion parameter images requires knowledge of the arterial blood flow in the form of an arterial input function (AIF). This work proposes a novel method to automatically identify AIFs in computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) datasets using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). METHODS: One-hundred CTP and 100 PWI datasets of acute ischemic stroke patients were available for model development and evaluation. For each modality, 50 datasets were used for CNN training and 20 for validation using manually selected AIFs and non-arterial tissue concentration time curves. Model evaluation was performed using the remaining 30 independent validation datasets from each modality with manual AIF selections provided by two experts as ground truth. Additionally, AIFs were also extracted using an established automatic shape-based algorithm for comparison purposes. The extracted AIFs were compared using normalized cross-correlation and shape features as well as using the Dice similarity metric and volume of the corresponding hypoperfusion (Tmax > 6 s) lesions. RESULTS: The cross-correlation values comparing the manual AIFs and those extracted by the proposed CNN method were significantly greater than those comparing the manual AIFs to the shape-based comparison method. Likewise, hypoperfusion lesions generated using the manually selected AIFs and CNN-based AIFs showed higher Dice values compared to hypoperfusion lesions generated using the comparison AIF extraction method. Shape features for AIFs generated by the proposed method did not differ significantly from the manual AIFs, with the exception that the CNN-derived AIFs for the PWI datasets showed marginally greater peak heights. CONCLUSION: Deep convolutional neural network models are viable for the automatic extraction of the AIF from CTP and PWI datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207