Automatic arterial input function selection in CT and MR perfusion datasets using deep convolutional neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The computation of perfusion parameter images requires knowledge of the arterial blood flow in the form of an arterial input function (AIF). This work proposes a novel method to automatically identify AIFs in computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) datasets using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). METHODS: One-hundred CTP and 100 PWI datasets of acute ischemic stroke patients were available for model development and evaluation. For each modality, 50 datasets were used for CNN training and 20 for validation using manually selected AIFs and non-arterial tissue concentration time curves. Model evaluation was performed using the remaining 30 independent validation datasets from each modality with manual AIF selections provided by two experts as ground truth. Additionally, AIFs were also extracted using an established automatic shape-based algorithm for comparison purposes. The extracted AIFs were compared using normalized cross-correlation and shape features as well as using the Dice similarity metric and volume of the corresponding hypoperfusion (Tmax > 6 s) lesions. RESULTS: The cross-correlation values comparing the manual AIFs and those extracted by the proposed CNN method were significantly greater than those comparing the manual AIFs to the shape-based comparison method. Likewise, hypoperfusion lesions generated using the manually selected AIFs and CNN-based AIFs showed higher Dice values compared to hypoperfusion lesions generated using the comparison AIF extraction method. Shape features for AIFs generated by the proposed method did not differ significantly from the manual AIFs, with the exception that the CNN-derived AIFs for the PWI datasets showed marginally greater peak heights. CONCLUSION: Deep convolutional neural network models are viable for the automatic extraction of the AIF from CTP and PWI datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".