Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clustering is a fundamental problem of spatio-temporal data analysis. Given a set 𝒳 of n moving entities, each of which corresponds to a sequence of τ time-stamped points in ℝ^d, a k-clustering of 𝒳 is a partition of 𝒳 into k disjoint subsets that optimizes a given objective function. In this paper, we consider two clustering problems, k-Center and k-MM, where the goal is to minimize the maximum value of the objective function over the duration of motion for the worst-case input 𝒳. We show that both problems are NP-hard when k is an arbitrary input parameter, even when the motion is restricted to ℝ. We provide an exact algorithm for the 2-MM clustering problem in ℝ^d that runs in O(τ d n²) time. The running time can be improved to O(τ n log{n}) when the motion is restricted to ℝ. We show that the 2-Center clustering problem is NP-hard in ℝ². Our 2-MM clustering algorithm provides a 1.15-approximate solution to the 2-Center clustering problem in ℝ². Moreover, finding a (1.15-ε)-approximate solution remains NP-hard for any ε >0. For both the k-MM and k-Center clustering problems in ℝ^d, we provide a 2-approximation algorithm that runs in O(τ d n k) time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".