Emergence of vancomycin- and teicoplanin-resistant Enterococcus faecium via vanD5-harbouring large genomic island
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment of VRE is of clinical concern. While certain numbers of vanD-type VRE have been isolated, only two vanD5-harbouring Enterococcus faecium isolates have been reported in Canada and Japan. METHODS: We report the isolation of vanD5-type E. faecium and the first ever determination of the whole-genome sequence to investigate the possible mechanisms of the acquisition of the vanD5 gene cluster in E. faecium. RESULTS: Two vanD5-harbouring vancomycin-resistant E. faecium were isolated from the skin (SMVRE19) and faeces (SMVRE20) of a patient with a skin ulcer in Japan. The isolates exhibited vancomycin and teicoplanin MIC values of 128 mg/L, whilst the previous isolates of vanD5-harbouring E. faecium were only resistant to vancomycin. SMVRE19 and SMVRE20 were clones related to ST18, which is also seen in vanA- and vanB-type VRE. These isolates harboured an insertion element, ISEfm1, in the ddl gene, similar to a previously described teicoplanin-resistant vanD3-type E. faecium. The vanD5 gene cluster was integrated into the SMVRE20 chromosome as a part of a large genomic island (approximately 127 kb), similar to other recently spreading vanD variants in the Netherlands. The genomic island shared the greatest similarity with a part of the Blautia coccoides genome sequence, except for the region surrounding the vanD gene cluster. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports that emergence of vancomycin- and teicoplanin-resistant vanD5-type E. faecium occurred via acquisition of the vanD5 cluster and ISEfm1 insertion into ddl. Considering the genetic similarity between the various VRE strains, the current study should serve as a warning against the spread of vanD5-type VRE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".