MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037769099 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.3005091

Hybrid Smart Temperature Compensation System for Piezoresistive 3D Stress Sensors

2020· article· en· W3037769099 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammed O. Kayed, Amr A. Balbola, Edmond Lou, Walied A. Moussa

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsPiezoresistive effectCompensation (psychology)Stress (linguistics)Materials scienceTemperature measurementSiliconSensitivity (control systems)Electronic engineeringOptoelectronicsAcousticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new hybrid temperature compensation system for doped silicon-based piezoresistive 3D stress sensors. The developed compensation system integrates a temperature sensor, placed in close proximity to the stress sensing rosettes, with the artificial neural networks (ANNs). In this work, the n-type circular piezoresistor featured over (111) silicon plane was employed to capture the local temperature variations, within the sensing chip. The extracted temperature changes, along with the resistance changes, are fed, as inputs, to the ANNs to compensate the temperature effect on the acquired signals for more accurate stress measurement. The proposed compensation system was experimentally evaluated while extracting stress applied up to 60 MPa at different temperatures within a range from 0 °C to 50 °C. The developed system was successfully able reduce the maximum full scale error, obtained from using only a temperature sensor for compensation, by ~55%. The new system has merit since it has the capability to compensate for both resistance and sensitivity, for 3D stress sensor, with no need for additional circuitry. Moreover the employed temperature sensor shares the same thermal environment with the stress sensing rosette.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicSensor Technology and Measurement SystemsFrench-language works237,207