MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037815066 · doi:10.1061/9780784483077.005

A Blind Condition-Based Maintenance Framework for Real-Time Fault Detection and Degradation Modeling of the LINK APM Gearbox

2020· article· en· W3037815066 on OpenAlexaff
Stanley Fong, Sriram Narasimhan, Mike Riseborough

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto and Region Conservation AuthorityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntimeReliability engineeringCondition-based maintenanceCondition monitoringReliability (semiconductor)Fault (geology)Preventive maintenancePredictive maintenanceAircraft maintenanceComputer sciencePrognosticsMaintenance actionsDegradation (telecommunications)Fault detection and isolationCorrective maintenanceEngineeringReal-time computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automated people movers (APMs) are a critical piece of infrastructure in many airport operations, providing passengers, and airport personnel with an efficient means of travel between terminals, connections, or parking facilities. Reliability and sustained uptime of these APMs are paramount for efficient operation. Traditional maintenance strategies which employ routine maintenance can result in unnecessary, unwanted system downtime, as well as wasted labour and material resources. Preventative maintenance, in the form of condition-based maintenance (CBM), is an alternative maintenance strategy that circumvents the pitfalls of traditional strategies. CBM works by continuously monitoring the APM system for any signs of an incipient fault, and promptly notifying maintenance personnel when a fault is detected. In other words, maintenance is only performed on an as-needed basis, maximizing both system uptime, and distribution of resources. However, current CBM approaches are not without their own drawbacks. These approaches often focus on monitoring the system as a whole, rather than monitoring individual components. Furthermore, the accuracy of these approaches is heavily dependent on the availability of historical data. In this paper, a robust, blind CBM framework for monitoring of the LINK APM gearbox is presented. The proposed framework utilizes vibration measurements coupled with a novel signal pre-processing algorithm to detect incipient faults and build degradation models of the monitored system. Contrary to the current body of CBM approaches, the proposed approach is capable of monitoring and modeling the degradation of different families of components (i.e., gears and bearings) separately, allowing for increased detection and life-cycle prediction accuracy. Additionally, the proposed framework requires no historical data or prior knowledge of the system: detection accuracy and confidence in the degradation model parameters gradually increases as new sensor data becomes available. The underlying pre-processing algorithm has been validated using data collected from a number of real industrial systems and was shown to perform well under a wide variety of operating conditions. The blind, computationally efficient nature of the pre-processing algorithm, coupled with its minimal hardware requirements, allows the proposed CBM framework to be easily implementable on any APM system or rotating machinery asset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207