Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
$\newcommand{\c}{\mathcal{C}}\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}$An important task in trajectory analysis is clustering. The results of a clustering are often summarized by a single representative trajectory and an associated size of each cluster. We study the problem of computing a suitable representative of a set of similar trajectories. To this end we define a central trajectory $\c$, which consists of pieces of the input trajectories, switches from one entity to another only if they are within a small distance of each other, and such that at any time $t$, the point $\c(t)$ is as central as possible. We measure centrality in terms of the radius of the smallest disk centered at $\c(t)$ enclosing all entities at time $t$, and discuss how the techniques can be adapted to other measures of centrality. We first study the problem in $\R^1$, where we show that an optimal central trajectory $\c$ representing $n$ trajectories, each consisting of $\tau$ edges, has complexity $\Theta(\tau n^2)$ and can be computed in $O(\tau n^2 \log n)$ time. We then consider trajectories in $\R^d$ with $d\geq 2$, and show that the complexity of $\c$ is at most $O(\tau n^{5/2})$ and can be computed in $O(\tau n^3)$ time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it