MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La crise des catégorisations relatives à l’identité sexuée L’exemple du « troisième sexe »

2008· book-chapter· fr· W3038035156 on OpenAlex
Françoise Douaire‐Marsaudon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce travail propose de mettre en discussion la notion de « troisième sexe », en prenant appui sur deux cas rangés classiquement sous cette appellation : chez les Inuit, les personnes auxquelles la société impose un chevauchement de la frontière entre les sexes, selon la formule de l’anthropologue Bernard Saladin d’Anglure ; en Polynésie, les hommes-à-la-manière-des-femmes, comme, par exemple, le mahu à Tahiti. On verra que la notion de troisième sexe non seulement renforce le cloisonnement et la réification des catégories sexuées (homme/femme, masculin/féminin) mais, surtout, échoue à rendre intelligible la richesse des expériences ici en jeu, à savoir le chevauchement de la frontière entre les sexes. La notion de « troisième sexe », telle qu’elle est appréhendée en sciences sociales, offre ainsi un témoignage éclairant de la crise actuelle des catégorisations relatives à l’identité sexuée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.075
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it