Synthesis and evaluation of antimicrobial properties of some azole derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To synthesize new azole derivatives and determine their antimicrobial properties.
 Methods: The reaction of the intermediates (2a-2c) with 3a-3c in acetone/potassium carbonate solution yielded 4a-4i, which were characterized using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR), carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (13C-NMR)) and mass spectrometry (MS). Compounds 4a-4i were assessed for their antibacterial and antifungal effects using the sequential dilution technique, relative to ofloxacin and ketoconazole.
 Results: The spectral data for 4a-4i were consistent with the assigned structures. The MIC of compound 4h (10 μg/ml) was similar to that of ketoconazole against Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium citrinum, and Aspergillus niger. The MIC value of compound 4b (10 μg/ml) for Penicillium citrinum was comparable to that of ketoconazole while the MIC value of compound 4d against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (20 μg/ml) was equivalent to the corresponding MIC value for ofloxacin.
 Conclusion: The synthesized compounds bearing boronic acid moiety are good antimicrobial agents. Accordingly, further investigation into the thiazole-imidazole or thiazole-triazole derivatives bearing boronic acid moiety is suggested.
 Keywords: Synthesis, Imidazole, Thiazole, Triazole, Antimicrobials
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".