MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038077185 · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103863

Alternate soaking enables easy control of mineralized collagen scaffold mechanics from nano- to macro-scale

2020· article· en· W3038077185 on OpenAlexafffund
Brendan H. Grue, Luke C. Vincent, Laurent Kreplak, Samuel P. Veres

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversitySaint Mary's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie UniversityCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsFibrilMineralization (soil science)ScaffoldMaterials scienceDecellularizationNanoscopic scaleFlexural modulusBiomedical engineeringBiomineralizationModulusFlexural strengthChemistryComposite materialNanotechnologyChemical engineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanical properties of biologic scaffolds are critical to cellular interactions and hence functional response within the body. In the case of scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration, engineered scaffolds created by combining collagen with inorganic mineral are increasingly being explored, due to their favourable structural and chemical characteristics. Development of a method for controlling the mechanics of these scaffolds could lead to significant additional advantages by harnessing the intrinsic mechnotransduction pathways of stem cells via appropriate control of scaffold mechanical properties. Here we present a method for controlling the macroscale flexural modulus of mineralized collagen sheets, and the radial indentation modulus of the sheets' constituent collagen fibrils. Scaffolds were created starting with sheets of highly aligned, natively structured collagen fibrils, prepared via cryosectioning of decellularized tendon. Sheets underwent an alternate soaking mineralization procedure, with sequential exposure to citrate-doped calcium and carbonate-containing phosphate solutions, both of which included poly aspartic acid. The extent of scaffold mineralization was controlled via number of repeated mineralization cycles: 0 (unmineralized), 5, 10, and 20 cycles were trialed. Following scaffold preparation, ultrastructure, macroscale flexural modulus, and nanoscale indentation modulus were assessed. Surface architecture studied by SEM, and inspection of individual extracted fibrils by TEM and AFM confirmed that fibrils became increasingly laden with mineral as the number of mineralization cycles increased. Measurements of collagen fibril nanomechanics using AFM showed that the radial modulus of collagen fibrils increased linearly with mineralization cycles completed, from 215 ± 125 MPa for fibrils from unmineralized (0 cycle) scaffolds to 778 ± 302 MPa for fibrils from the 20 mineralization cycle scaffolds. Measurements of scaffold macromechanics via flexural testing also showed a linear increase in flexural modulus with increasing number of mineralization cycles completed, from 18 ± 7 MPa for the 5 cycle scaffolds to 156 ± 50 MPa for the 20 cycle scaffolds. The process detailed herein provides a way to create mineralized collagen scaffolds with easily controllable mechanical properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materialsSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207