Decompression illness type II with stroke: challenging situation in acute neurorehabilitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A professional 55-year-old female experienced diver, who surfaced after the second dive, had a lucid interval before dropping Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to 3/15. She was admitted to intensive care unit and commenced on hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Her initial computed tomography of the head was normal but her magnetic resonance imaging of the brain at 48 hours showed extensive bilateral cortical watershed territory infarcts. She developed acute respiratory distress syndrome which resolved within a few days. Her GCS gradually improved from 3/15 to 6/15, was repatriated to United Kingdom after about 2 weeks of the insult and admitted to a tertiary care hospital where she had myoclonic seizures and was started on anti-epileptics. Then she was transferred to the Rehabilitation Medicine Ward of Leicester General Hospital, with GCS 14/15 with poor sitting balance, for her management and rehabilitation. She had weakness of right upper and lower limbs, dysarthria, neuropathic bilateral shoulder pains, pressure ulcer of left heel, bladder and bowel incontinence and cognitive issues. She improved to have significant neurological recovery within next 3 months, became ambulant independently and bladder and bowel continent. Her Barthel index (from 4 to 17), Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test, Adembrook Cognitive Examination and Berg Balance scale (from 33/56 to 44/56) improved significantly. Early diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation can have a significant impact on the recovery of decompression illness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".