A mobile digital technology (Fionet™) to improve accuracy, completeness and timeliness of research data compared with a non-digital system in Kenya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The World Health Organization’s Global Malaria Program implemented a multi-country study to assess the entomological and epidemiological impact of long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spray (IRS). Study activities included home visits to perform a LLIN survey and malaria testing of children in the household. In Kenya, Fionet™, a technology for automated malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test (mRDT) processing and interpretation at point-of-care, was evaluated against traditional paper-based methods and manual mRDT processing. Objective: To measure and compare the accuracy of diagnosis, completeness, and timeliness of data transmission between a digital mobile solution (Fionet™) and a paper-based system. Methodology: A randomised cluster sampling design of two cohorts: 1) an Active Infection Detection cohort, and 2) an Active Case Detection cohort was undertaken between November 2013 and April 2014. Community Health Workers (CHWs) visited rural households to: 1) measure malaria prevalence in children under the age of five using mRDTs, and 2) survey the use and physical status of LLINs in the household. Ten clusters were randomly assigned to Fionet™ to perform automated testing, interpretation, and survey data capture. Fionet™ transmitted all the tests and survey data to a cloud-based database. Results: A total of 1770 households were visited, 437 children tested, and 742 LLINs inspected. Fionet™ significantly improved the quality of data gathered; a two-fold increase in adherence to study protocols using Fionet™ resulted in more accurate data, data completeness was 10 times higher than with paper-based collection methods, and 87% of data were available in less than one day. Fionet™ significantly improved data quality and management, which enhanced the health system’s ability to meet the research objectives. This technology can help ensure accurate, complete, and timely availability of data. Future studies should incorporate mobile technologies such as Fionet™ to improve RDT based diagnostics of malaria and data quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".