Radio Frequency Interference Detection using Deep Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radio frequency interference (RFI) is considered as anomalous disruptive parasite signal due to its harmful impact in wireless communication. That is why, RFI mitigation is indispensable to avoid this impact. Detecting and localizing the RFI are the first steps in RFI mitigation process. In this paper, we propose two approaches to detect and localize RFI using the supervised and unsupervised techniques of deep learning. First, our research investigates an object detection algorithm based on convolutionnal neural network as a supervised approach. This proposition is based on the object detection algorithm You Only Look Once v3 (YOLO-v3) trained on real-world data contaminated by multiples sources of RFI. Second, we propose the utilisation of Convolutionnal Autoencoder (CAE) as an unsupervised approach. Experimental results show that the RFI detection by YOLO-v3 is relatively fast and it has an excellent accurate detection rate of 94% and show that the average precision of the YOLO-V3 algorithm can achieve 89%. For CAE, the average precision achieves 78% and outperforms the supervised approach in certain cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it