MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Indoor Localization Using Channel State Information With Regression Artificial Neural Networks

2020· article· en· W3038788938 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Mohsen Samadani, Yvon Savaria, Chahé Nerguizian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkPerceptronArtificial intelligenceNoveltyNetwork packetChannel (broadcasting)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionChannel state informationMultilayer perceptronRegressionMatching (statistics)Data miningMachine learningStatisticsMathematicsTelecommunicationsComputer networkWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the Channel State Information (CSI) is used to locate mobile stations in an indoor environment. The novelty of our technique is to use multiple packets of CSI for each location without feature extraction to provide a reach fingerprint. Two different mapping algorithms are investigated and compared with each other in terms of location accuracy and precision. In the first approach, the collected CSIs are fed to a multilayer perceptron (MLP) as input features and the learned artificial neural network (ANN) is used as a pattern-matching algorithm in order to predict a user's location. The second approach uses General Regression Neural Networks (GRNNs) from which, exploration is performed to find the best hidden-layer configuration and spread factors for Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) and General Regression Neural Networks (GRNNs), respectively. The novelty of this work partly stems from data expanding multiple CSI packets. The paper finally compares, the accuracy of our proposed method with previously reported state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207