Landscapes, Wildlife, and Grey Owl: Settler Colonial Imaginaries and Tourist Spaces in William J. Oliver’s Parks Branch Films, 1920s-1930s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the interwar period, the Calgary-based filmmaker, William J. Oliver, filmed the majority of motion pictures for Canada’s Parks Branch. In addition to promoting colonial-nationalist landscapes, Oliver specialized in wildlife films. Oliver’s “beaver films,” which featured ersatz Indigeneity in the persona of Grey Owl who, in reality, was the English-born writer and conservationist Archibald Belaney, are examined. Grey Owl centered his broad naturalist message on the beaver – an imperial and national signifier – whose population had declined across northern Canada due to over-hunting. In the settler colonial imagination, Grey Owl appears as a liminal figure, existing somewhere between human and nonhuman animal. Oliver’s wildlife productions fostered human–nonhuman animal relationships based on an appreciation for the authentic creatures within the protected boundaries of the nation. The erasure of Indigenous communities and the concomitant preservation of native nonhuman animals in their natural habitat has been central to the Canadian park imaginary since its founding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".